common.pageHeaderLogo.altText6767b2337ca2b

Artykuły

Nr 2(17) (2019): Nowa kultura prawdy

Post Post-Truth: Epistemologies of Disintegration and the Praxeology of Truth

Przesłane
6 December 2020
Opublikowane
01-11-2019

Abstrakt

Our truth culture has changed. Yet we are not living in a post-truth era but in a truth era – an observation of the ongoing debates shows a proliferation of invocations of truth. This paper argues that in order to grasp this transition, we should not refer to classical truth theories or common oppositions such as knowledge and belief, objectivity and subjectivity. Instead, we should focus on concrete practices in concrete situations: on “doing truth.” This paper introduces the concept of a “praxeology of truth,” which sets out to analyse truth by means of two parameters: “truth scenes” and “truth figures.” In suggesting that to ask about truth is to pose the question of power, it follows Michel Foucault, but it regards the invocation of truth as a technique of identity politics and truth as a social operator.

Bibliografia

  1. Bachelard G. 1984. The New Scientific Spirit, transl. Arthur Goldhammer, Beacon Press.
  2. Badiou A. 2010. “Die gegenwärtige Welt und das Begehren der Philosophie,” [in:] Politik der Wahrheit, eds. A. Badiou, J. Rancière, Turia und Kant, pp. 7–35.
  3. Ball J. 2017. Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World, Biteback Publishing.
  4. Blackburn S. 2005. Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed, Allen Lane.
  5. Blackburn S. 2007. “Kehrt die Wahrheit tatsächlich zurück?,” Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, vol. 1(3), pp. 5–20, https://doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937- 2007-3-5.
  6. Blühdorn I. 2013. Simulative Demokratie. Neue Politik nach der postdemokratischen Wende, Suhrkamp.
  7. Blumenberg H. 2001 [1957]. “Licht als Metapher der Wahrheit. Im Vorfeld der philosophischen Begriffsbildung,” [in:] Ästhetische und metaphorologische Schriften, ed. A. Haverkamp, Suhrkamp, pp. 139–171.
  8. Boghossian P. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287185.003.0006
  9. Boghossian P. 2013. Angst vor der Wahrheit: Ein Plädoyer gegen Relativismus und Konstruktivismus, transl. J. Rometsch, M. Gabriel, Suhrkamp.
  10. Butler J. 1988. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory,” [in:] Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory, eds. K. Conboy, N. Medina, S. Stanbury, Columbia University Press, pp. 401–417, https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893.
  11. Butler J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection, Stanford University Press.
  12. Changeux J. 2004. The Physiology of Truth: Neuroscience and Human Knowledge, transl. M. DeBevoise, Belknap Press.
  13. D’Ancona M. 2017. Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back, Ebury Press.
  14. Daston L. 1995. “The Moral Economy of Science,” Osiris, vol. 2(10): Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science, pp. 2–24, https://doi.org/10.1086/368740.
  15. Davis E. 2017. Post Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It, Little, Brown.
  16. Derrida J. 1982. “Signature Event Context,” [in:] J. Derrida, Margins of Philosophy, transl. A. Bass, University of Chicago Press, pp. 307–330.
  17. Dutt C., Staub M., eds. 2007. Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, vol. 1(3): Die Rückkehr der Wahrheit, https://doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937-2007-3.
  18. Eggers D. 2020. “Dave Eggers über Wahnsinn,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, vol. 118(23/24.5), p. 52.
  19. Engel P., Rorty R. 2007. What’s the Use of Truth?, Columbia University Press.
  20. Evans R. 1997. In Defense of History, Granta.
  21. Ewald F., Waldenfels B. 1992. Spiele der Wahrheit: Michel Foucaults Denken, Suhrkamp.
  22. Fischer-Lichte E. 1998. “Inszenierung und Theatralität,” [in:] Inszenierungsgesellschaft: Ein einführendes Handbuch, eds. M. Jurga, H. Willems, Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 81–90, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89797-8_3.
  23. Flaig E. 2007. “Ohne Wahrheit keine Wissenschaft: Überlegung zur Wendung nach den Wenden,” [in:] Wahre Geschichte–Geschichte als Ware: Die Verantwortung der historischen Forschung für Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft, eds. C. Kühberger, C. Lübke, T. Terberger, Leidorf, pp. 49–80.
  24. Flügel-Martinsen O. 2011. Jenseits von Glauben und Wissen: Philosophischer Versuch über das Leben in der Moderne, transcript.
  25. Foucault M. 1978. The History of Sexuality: Volume 1: An Introduction, transl. R. Hurley, Pantheon.
  26. Foucault M. 1980. “The History of Sexuality: Interview,” Oxford Literary Review, vol. 4(2), pp. 3–14.
  27. Foucault M. 1990. The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality, vol. 2, transl. R. Hurley, Vintage.
  28. Foucault M. 1997. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, vol. 1, ed. P. Rabinow, Penguin.
  29. Foucault M. 2006. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–1982, transl. G. Burchell, ed. F. Gros, Picador.
  30. Foucault M. 2011. The Courage of the Truth (The Government of Self and Others II): Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984, transl. G. Burchell, ed. F. Gros, Palgrave.
  31. Foucault M. 2014. On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1979–1980 and Oedipal Knowledge, transl. G. Burchell, ed. M. Senellart, Palgrave.
  32. Frankfurt H. 2006. On Truth, Knopf.
  33. Friedel A.-S. 2017. “Editorial,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 67(13), p. 3, https://www.bpb.de/apuz/245211/editorial, accessed 29.05.2020.
  34. Fuller S. 2018. Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game, Anthem Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgd30v.
  35. Gabriel G. 2013. “Fakten oder Fiktionen? Zum Erkenntniswert der Geschichte,” Historische Zeitschrift, vol. 297, pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1524/hzhz.2013.0305.
  36. Gabriel M. 2013. “Nachwort,” [in:] P. Boghossian, Angst vor der Wahrheit: Ein Plädoyer gegen Relativismus und Konstruktivismus, transl. J. Rometsch, M. Gabriel, Suhrkamp, pp. 135–156.
  37. Gabriel M., Eckoldt M. 2019. Die ewige Wahrheit und der Neue Realismus: Gespräche über (fast) alles, was der Fall ist, Carl-Auer Verlag.
  38. Gadamer H. 2004 [1975]. Truth and Method, 2nd rev. ed., transl. rev. J. Weinheimer, D. Marshall, Continuum.
  39. Gehring P., Gelhard A., eds. 2012. Parrhesia: Foucault und der Mut zur Wahrheit, Diaphanes.
  40. Gerhardt V. 2011. “Über Wahrheit und Lüge in der Politik,” Merkur, vol. 744, pp. 393–402.
  41. Gieryn T. 2006. “City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 36(1), pp. 5–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705054526.
  42. Gieryn T. 2018. Truth Spots: How Places Make People Believe, University of Chicago Press.
  43. Giraud E., Aghassi-Isfahani S.-N. 2020. “Post-Truths, Common Worlds, and Critical Politics: Critiquing Bruno Latour’s Renewed Critique of Critique,” Cultural Politics, vol. 16(1), pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8017200.
  44. Goffman E. 1956. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life, University of Edinburgh.
  45. Haraway D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies, vol. 14(3), pp. 575–599, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
  46. Haraway D. 2008. When Species Meet, University of Minnesota Press.
  47. Harsin J. 2015. “Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies,” Communication, Culture & Critique, vol. 8(2), pp. 327–333, https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097.
  48. Jardine N. 2000 [1991]. The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences, Oxford University Press.
  49. Keyes R. 2004. The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life, St. Martin’s Press.
  50. Kiesow R., Simon D., eds. 2000. Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Wahrheit: Zum Grundlagenstreit in der Geschichtswissenschaft, Campus.
  51. Kleeberg B., Langenohl A. 2011. “Kulturalisierung, Dekulturalisierung,” Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie, vol. 2, pp. 281–302, https://doi.org/10.28937/1000106587.
  52. Kleeberg B., Suter R. 2014a. “‘Doing Truth’. Bausteine einer Praxeologie der Wahrheit,” Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie, vol. 8(2), pp. 211–226, https://doi.org/10.28937/1000106675.
  53. Kleeberg B., Suter R., eds. 2014b. Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie, vol. 8(2): Wahrheit.
  54. Knaller S. 2007. Ein Wort aus der Fremde: Geschichte und Theorie des Begriffs Authentizität, Winter.
  55. Knorr-Cetina K. 2002. Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis: Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft, Suhrkamp.
  56. Kofman A. 2018. “Bruno Latour, the Post-Truth Philosopher, Mounts a Defence of Science,” New York Times Magazine, 25.10.2018, https://www. nytimes.com/2018/10/25/magazine/bruno-latour-post-truth-philosopher-science.html, accessed 29.05.2020.
  57. Konersmann R. 2008. “Implikationen der nackten Wahrheit,” Scholion: Bulletin, vol. 5, pp. 21–55.
  58. Kuhn T. 1996 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed., University of Chicago Press.
  59. Landwehr A. 2011. “W. Paravicini: Die Wahrheit des Historikers,” http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/2011-2-011, accessed 7.05.2020.
  60. Latour B. 1992. “One More Turn after the Social Turn,” [in:] The Social Dimension of Science, ed. E. McMullin, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 272–294.
  61. Latour B. 1994. We Have Never Been Modern, transl. C. Porter, Harvard University Press.
  62. Latour B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry, vol. 30(2), pp. 225–248, https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
  63. Latour B. 2007. “A Textbook Case Revisited: Knowledge as a Mode of Existence,” [in:] The Handbook of Science and Technolog y Studies, eds. E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman, MIT Press, pp. 83–112.
  64. Latour B. 2018. Aramis, oder die Liebe der Technik. Mit einem neuen Vorwort v. Bruno Latour und einem Nachwort v. Henning Schmidgen, Historische Wissensforschung, vol. 10, Mohr Siebeck.
  65. Latour B., Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press.
  66. Law J. 2008. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, Routledge.
  67. Liniger S., Suter R. 2013. “Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Zeitfiguren bei Nayler, Hobbes und Defoe,” [in:] Dynamische Figuren: Gestalten der Zeit im Barock, eds. J. Lande, R. Schlögl, R. Suter, Rombach, pp. 209–240.
  68. Luhmann N. 2000. The Reality of the Mass Media, Stanford University Press.
  69. McIntyre L. 2018. Post-Truth, MIT Press.
  70. McMillan S.L. 2017. Lies, Damned Lies and Alternative Facts: A Truth Seeker’s Guide to Navigating Post-Truth Society, KC Editing.
  71. Mannheim K. 1964. Wissenssoziologie, Luchterhand.
  72. Mannheim K. 1965 [1929]. Ideologie und Utopie, 4th ed., Schulte-Bulmke.
  73. Moore G.E., Ramsey F.P. 1927. “Facts and Propositions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 7, pp. 153–206.
  74. Nietzsche F. 2007 [1882]. The Gay Science. With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs, ed. Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press.
  75. Paravicini W. 2010. Die Wahrheit der Historiker, De Gruyter.
  76. Pickering A. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press.
  77. Pickering A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, University of Chicago Press.
  78. Pickering A. 2009. “The Politics of Theory: Producing Another World, with Some Thoughts on Latour,” Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 2(1), pp. 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064204.
  79. Pickering A., Guzik K., eds. 2008. The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society, and Becoming, Duke University Press.
  80. Pörksen B. 2018. “Die neuen Wahrheitskriege,” Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft, vol. 19(2), pp. 69–76, https://doi.org/10.14361/zfmw-2018-100209.
  81. Reckwitz A. 2017. Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten: Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne, Suhrkamp.
  82. Regan M. 2017. “‘Science Is Crucial to the Future’ – March for Science Draws Thousands,” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/march-forscience, accessed 7.05.2020.
  83. Rheinberger H. 1997. “Experimental Complexity in Biology: Some Epistemological and Historical Remarks,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 64(4), pp. 245–254, https://doi.org/10.1086/392604.
  84. Rheinberger H. 2001. Experimentalsysteme und epistemische Dinge: Eine Geschichte der Proteinsynthese im Reagenzglas, Wallstein.
  85. Rose N. 1996a. “Identity, Genealogy, History,” [in:] Questions of Cultural Identity, eds. S. Hall, P. Du Gay, Sage, pp. 128–150.
  86. Rose N. 1996b. “The Death of the Social? Re-Figuring the Territory of Government,” Economy and Society, vol. 25, pp. 327–356, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000018.
  87. Ruffing R. 2008. Michel Foucault, Fink.
  88. Rüsen J. 2006. “Wissenschaft und Wahrheit: Anmerkungen zum kulturellen Anspruch rationalen Denkens,” [in:] J. Rüsen, Kultur macht Sinn: Orientierung zwischen Gestern und Morgen, Böhlau, pp. 157–168.
  89. Sarasin P. 2019. “Anything goes”: Paul Feyerabend und die etwas andere Postmoderne, Geschichte der Gegenwart, https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-182292.
  90. Schlögl R. 2008. “Kommunikation und Vergesellschaftung unter Anwesenden: Formen des Sozialen und ihre Transformation in der Frühen Neuzeit,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 34, pp. 155–224, https://doi.org/10.13109/gege.2008.34.2.155.
  91. Schmidt R. 2012. Soziologie der Praktiken: Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen, Suhrkamp.
  92. Seemann M. 2017. “Digitaler Tribalismus und Fake News,” ctrl+verlust, https://www.ctrl-verlust.net/digitaler-tribalismus-und-fake-news/, accessed 28.05.2020.
  93. Shapin S. 1995. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth- Century England, University of Chicago Press, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001.
  94. Signori G., Rösinger A. 2014. Die Figur des Augenzeugen: Geschichte und Wahrheit im fächer- und epochenübergreifenden Vergleich, UVK.
  95. Strawson P.F. 1949. “Truth,” Analysis, vol. 9, pp. 83–97, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/9.6.83.
  96. Taylor C. 1995. The Malaise of Modernity, House of Anansi Press.
  97. Trilling L. 1972. Sincerity and Authenticity, Harvard University Press.
  98. Umbach M., Humphrey M. 2018. Authenticity: The Cultural History of a Political Concept, Palgrave Macmillan.
  99. Wehler H. 1998. Die Herausforderung der Kulturgeschichte, Beck.
  100. Weingart P. 2017. “‘Wahres Wissen’ und demokratisch verfasste Gesellschaft,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 67(13), pp. 11–16, https://www.bpb.de/apuz/245215/wahres-wissen-und-demokratisch-verfasste-gesellschaft, accessed 30.09.2020.
  101. Wilber K. 2017. Trump and a Post-Truth World, Shambhala.
  102. Willems H. 2009. “Zur Einführung: Theatralität als Ansatz, (Ent-)Theatralisierung als These,” [in:] Die Theatralisierung der Gesellschaft, ed. H. Willems, vol. 1, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 13–56, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91442-8_1.
  103. Williams B. 2003. Wahrheit und Wahrhaftigkeit, Suhrkamp.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

41-50 z 191

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.