common.pageHeaderLogo.altText674f42f66ab50

Wstęp

Nr 2(17) (2019): Nowa kultura prawdy

A New Culture of Truth? On the Transformation of Political Epistemologies since the 1960s in Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe

Przesłane
6 December 2020
Opublikowane
01-11-2019

Bibliografia

  1. Cain F., Kleeberg B., Surman J. 2019. “The Past and Present of Political Epistemologies of (Eastern) Europe,” Historyka. Studia Metodologiczne, vol. 49, pp. 7-13, https://doi.org/10.24425/hsm.2019.130572.
  2. Carolan M.S., Bell M.B. 2003. “In Truth We Trust: Discourse, Phenomenology, and the Social Relations of Knowledge in an Environmental Dispute,” Environmental Values, vol. 12(2), pp. 225–245, https://doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341306.
  3. Daston L. 2020. “Ground-Zero Empiricism,” Critical Inquiry, https://critinq.wordpress.com/2020/04/10/ground-zero-empiricism/, accessed 20.07.2020.
  4. Ehlers S., Zachmann K. 2020. “Wissen und Begründen: Evidenzals umkämpfte Ressource in der Wissensgesellschaft. Einleitung,” [in:] Wissen und Begründen. Evidenz als umkämpfte Ressource in der Wissensgesellschaft, eds. S. Ehlers, K. Zachmann, Nomos, pp. 9–29, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748903383.
  5. Farkas J., Schou J. 2020. Post-Truth, Fake News and Democracy: Mapping the Politics of Falsehood, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429317347.
  6. Fedor J. 2017. “Memory, Kinship, and the Mobilization of the Dead: The Russian State and the ‘Immortal Regiment’ Movement,” [in:] War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, eds. J. Fedor, M. Kangaspuro, J. Lassila, T. Zhurzhenko, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 307–345, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66523-8_11.
  7. Gieryn Th.F. 2018. Truth Spots: How Places Make People Believe, University of Chicago Press.
  8. Grigoryev L. 2011. “Elites – the Choice for Modernization,” [in:] Russia: The Challenges of Transformation, eds. D. Trenin, P. Dutkiewicz, New York University Press, pp. 191–224, https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814785003.003.0007.
  9. Groys B. 1992 [1988]. The Total Art of Stalinism: Avant-Garde, Aesthetic Dictatorship, and Beyond, transl. C. Rougle, Princeton University Press.
  10. Halmai G. 2019. “Dismantling Constitutional Review in Hungary,” Revista di diritti comparati, vol. 1, pp. 31–47.
  11. Hays P.V. 2016. “Contested Boundaries: How Scientists Deal with Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Language,” [in:] Language as a Scientific Tool: Shaping Scientific Language across Time and National Traditions, eds. M. MacLeod, E. Smirnova, R. Sumillera, J. Surman, Routledge, pp. 74–85, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657257-6.
  12. Hoffmann C., ed. 2008. Daten sichern. Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren der Aufzeichnung, Diaphanes.
  13. Kleeberg B., Suter R. 2014. “‘Doing Truth’. Bausteine einer Praxeologie der Wahrheit,” Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie, vol. 8, pp. 211–226, https://doi.org/10.28937/1000106675.
  14. Krauthausen K., Nasim O.W., eds. 2010. Notieren, Skizzieren. Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren des Entwurfs, Diaphanes.
  15. Latour B., Woolgar S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage Publications.
  16. Levinson A. 2004. “Inaia Prostota” [The other simplicity], [in:] Opyt Sotsiografii: Statii, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 491–503.
  17. Oreskes N., Conway E.M. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, Bloomsbury Press.
  18. Pető A. 2020. “Genderforschung in Ungarn,” Ungarn-Jahrbuch. Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Hungarologie, vol. 35(2019), pp. 229–248.
  19. Petrov P. 2011. “The Industry of Truing: Socialist Realism, Reality, Realization,” Slavic Review, vol. 70(4), pp. 873–889, https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicreview.70.4.0873.
  20. Rabin R.C., Gabler E. 2020. “Two Huge Covid-19 Studies Are Retracted after Scientists Sound Alarms,” The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/health/coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine.html, accessed 20.07.2020.
  21. Reckwitz A. 2019. Das Ende der Illusionen – Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur in der Spätmoderne, Suhrkamp.
  22. Redden E. 2020. “Rush to Publish Risks Undermining COVID-19 Research,” Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/06/08/fast-pace-scientific-publishing-covid-comes-problems, accessed 20.07.2020.
  23. Roudakova N. 2017. Losing Pravda: Ethics and the Press in Post-Truth Russia, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316817117.
  24. Schmid U. 2015. Technologien der Seele. Vom Verfertigen der Wahrheit in der russischen Gegenwartskultur, Suhrkamp.
  25. Shapin S. 1992. “Why the Public Ought to Understand Sciencein-the-Making,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 1, pp. 127–130, https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/1/006.
  26. Smith K.E. 2019. “A Monument for Our Times? Commemorating Victims of Repression in Putin’s Russia,” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 71(8), pp. 1314–1344, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1648765.
  27. Wittmann B., ed. 2009. Spuren erzeugen. Zeichnen und Schreiben als Verfahrenmder Selbstaufzeichnung, Diaphanes.
  28. Yeung J., George S., Wagner M., Macaya M., Rocha V., Alfonso III F. 2020. “July 16 Coronavirus News,” CNN, https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-07-16-20-intl/h_6a7fcb4568d5d53614a363cf627065e4, accessed 20.07.2020.
  29. Zoltán R., Antonowicz D., Jaworska M. 2020. “Lengyel és magyar vezető testületek a felsőoktásban” [Polish and Hungarian supervisory bodies in higher education], Educatio, vol. 29(1), pp. 92–107, https://doi.org/10.1556/2063.29.2020.1.7.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.