##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

No. 2(11) (2016): Boredom

The Psychological View of Boredom – Theories and Models of Boredom

  • Maria Flakus
  • Łukasz Palt
Submitted
26 June 2020
Published
01-11-2016

Abstract

The phenomenon of boredom has often been discussed in the field of sociology. Nevertheless, given the close relationship between boredom and some dimensions of affective and cognitive functioning, it is also a focus of psychological research. At the outset, boredom was examined from the perspective of the psychology of work (as a factor disturbing the effectiveness of work) and psychoanalytic theory (which distinguishes adaptive and pathological forms of boredom). Currently, researchers emphasize that it is possible to distinguish many types of boredom. Distinctions are made using two kinds of criteria – the causes of boredom (situational versus internal) and the level of boredom’s negative effects. Researchers also point out that a proneness to boredom can be considered a dimension of individual differences. In the article, the authors present some of the most important theories and research on boredom. They also present psychological measures of boredom and proneness to boredom.

References

  1. Ahmed S.M.S. 1990. Psychometric Properties of the Boredom Proneness Scale, „Perceptual and Motor Skills”, nr 71(3), s. 963–966.
  2. Asseburg R., Frey A. 2013. Too Hard, Too Easy, or Just Right? The Relationship between Effort or Boredom and Ability-difficulty Fit, „Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling”, nr 55(1), s. 92–104.
  3. Bench S.W., Lench H.C. 2013. On the Function of Boredom, „Behavioral Sciences”, nr 3, s. 459–472.
  4. Bergler E. 1945. On the Disease Entity Boredom (Alyosis) and its Psychopathology, „Psychiatric Quarterly”, nr 19, s. 35–51.
  5. Bernstein H. 1975. Boredom and the Ready-made Life, „Social Research”, nr 42(3) s. 512–537.
  6. Blaszczynski A., McConaghy N., Frankova A. 1990. Boredom Proneness in Pathological Gambling, „Psychological Reports”, nr 67(1), s. 35–42.
  7. Bornstein R.F., Kale A.R., Cornell K.R. 1990. Boredom as Limiting Condition on the Mere Exposure Effect, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, nr 58(5), s. 791–800.
  8. Chruszczewski M.H. 2015. Psychologiczne koncepcje nudy, „Ruch Pedagogiczny”, nr 86(2), s. 15–31.
  9. Damrad-Frye R., Laird J.D. 1989. The Experience of Boredom. The Role of the Self-perception of Attention, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, nr 57(2), s. 315–320.
  10. Fahlman S., Mercer-Lynn K.B., Flora D.B., Eastwood J.D. 2013. Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Boredom Scale, „Assessment”, nr 20(1), s. 68–85.
  11. Farmer R., Sundberg N.D. 1986. Boredom Proneness. The Development and Correlates of a New Scale, „Journal of Personality Assessment”, nr 50(1), s. 4–17.
  12. Fenichel O. 1951. On the Psychology of Boredom, [w:] Organization and Pathology of Thought: Selected Sources, red. D. Rappaport, Columbia University Press, s. 349–361.
  13. Geiwitz P.J. 1966. Structure of Boredom, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, nr 3(5), s. 592–600.
  14. Goetz T., Frenzel A.C., Hall N.C., Nett U., Pekrun R., Lipnevich A. 2014. Types of Boredom: an Experience Sampling Approach, „Motivation and Emotion”, nr 38(3), s. 401–419.
  15. Gordon A., Wilkinson R., McGown A., Jovanoska S. 1997. The Psychometric Properties of the Boredom Proneness Scale: An Examination of its Validity, „Psychological Studies”, nr 42, s. 85–97.
  16. Greenson R.R. 1953. On Boredom, [w:] Explorations in Psychoanalysis, red. R.R. Greenson, International Universities Press, s. 45–60.
  17. Keltner D., Gross J.J. 1999. Functional Accounts of Emotions, „Cognition & Emotion”, nr 13(5), s. 467–480.
  18. Klapp O.E. 1986. Overload and Boredom: Essays on the Quality of Life in the Information Society, Greenwood Press.
  19. Kubose S.K. 1972. Motivational Effects of Boredom on Children’s Response Speeds, „Developmental Psychology”, nr 6, s. 302–305.
  20. LePera N. 2011. Relationships between Boredom Proneness, Mindfulness, Anxiety, Depression, and Substance Use, „The New School Psychology Bulletin”, nr 8(2), s. 15–25.
  21. London H., Schubert D.S. P., Washburn D. 1972. Increase of Autonomic Arousal by Boredom, „Journal of Abnormal Psychology”, nr 80(1), s. 29–36.
  22. Martin M., Sadlo G., Stew G. 2006. The Phenomenon of Boredom, „Qualitative Research in Psychology”, nr 3(3), s. 193–211.
  23. Neu J. 1998. Boring from within. Endogenous versus Reactive Boredom, [w:] Emotions and Psychopatholog y. Theory and Research, red. W.F. Flack, J.D. Laird, University Press, s. 158–170.
  24. O’Hanlon J.F. 1981. Boredom: Practical Consequences of a Theory, „Acta Psychologica”, nr 49(1), s. 53–82.
  25. Panksepp J. 2008. Emocjonalne systemy operacyjne a subiektywność: problemy metodologiczne i ramy pojęciowe dla neurobiologicznej analiz y afektu, [w:] Formy aktywności umysłu: ujęcia kognitywistyczne, t. 1: Emocje, percepcja, świadomość, red. A. Klawiter, tłum. A. Binder i in., Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, s. 73–111.
  26. Pekrun R., Elliot A.J., Maier M.A. 2006. Achievement Goals and Discrete Achievement Emotions. A Theoretical Model and Prospective Test, „Journal of Educational Psychology”, nr 98(3), s. 583–597.
  27. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Daniels L.M., Stupnisky R.H., Perry R.P. 2010. Boredom in Achievement Settings. Exploring Control-Value Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of a Neglect Emotion, „Journal of Educational Psychology”, nr 102(3), s. 531–549.
  28. Prinz J.J. 2008. Emocje jako ucieleśnione oceny, [w:] Formy aktywności umysłu: ujęcia kognitywistyczne, t. 1: Emocje, percepcja, świadomość, red. A. Klawiter, tłum. A. Binder i in., Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, s. 37–72.
  29. Sommers J., Vodanovich S.J. 2000. Boredom Proneness. Its Relationship to Psychological- and Physical-health Symptoms, „Journal of Clinical Psychology”, nr 56(1), s. 149–155.
  30. Todman M. 2003. Boredom and Psychotic Disorders. Cognitive and Motivational Issues, „Psychiatry”, nr 66(2), s. 146–167.
  31. Vodanovich S.J. 2003. Psychometric Measures of Boredom. A Review of the Literature, „Journal of Psychology”, nr 137(6), s. 569–595.
  32. Vodanovich S.J., Kass S.J. 1990. A Factor Analytic Study of the Boredom Proneness Scale, „Journal of Personality Assessment”, nr 55(1–2), s. 115–123.
  33. Vodanovich S.J., Watt J.D. 2016. Self-Report Measures of Boredom. An Updated Review of the Literature, „The Journal of Psychology”, nr 150(2), s. 196– 228.
  34. Vodanovich S.J., Watt J.D., Piotrowski Ch. 1997. Boredom Proneness in African American College Students. A Factor Analytic Perspective, „Education”, nr 118(2), s. 229–236.
  35. Watt J.D., Ewing J.E. 1996. Toward the Development and Validation of a Measure of Sexual Boredom, „Journal of Sex Research”, nr 33(1), s. 57–66.
  36. Zuckerman M. 1979. Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  37. Zuckerman M. 2006. Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking, [w:] Biology of Personality and Individual Differences, red. T. Canli, The Guilford Press, s. 37–59.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.