Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Nagłówek strony

Artykuły

Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii

The Voice of Society and the Crisis: The Potential and Limits of Reflexivity and Civility

  • Víctor Pérez-Díaz
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.12.12
Przesłane
22 maja 2020
Opublikowane
01-04-2017

Abstrakt

The strategic capacity of human agency to orient itself in a context of growing uncertainty and complexity depends on the degree and quality of its reflexivity and relationality, and of the civic impulse arising from the connection between both. The present article explores this capacity by analysing the results of an opinion survey carried out in May 2016, and by developing an argument about one collective agent: the Spanish citizenry. Spanish citizens send three main messages. First, they opt for a European course and for a range of policies consistent with convergence (and debate) between the traditions of social democracy and conservative liberalism. Second, they are attentive to the task of recreating a political community. Third, they ask for civil forms of doing politics. To send these messages they draw on socio-cultural resources, and forms of reflexivity and relationality. The article addresses society’s relations with the political class and with itself and the cultural resources (economic knowledge, historical narratives) that map these relationships within their global context and their past.

Bibliografia

  1. Archer M.S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Archer M.S. 2010. Introduction: The Reflexive Re-turn, [in:] Conversations about Reflexivity, ed. M.S. Archer, Routledge, pp. 1–13.
  3. Bakhtine M. 1970. Problèmes de la poétique de Dostoïevski, L’Age d’Homme.
  4. Caplan B. 2002. Systematically Biased Beliefs About Economics: Robust Evidence of Judgmental Anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy, “The Economic Journal”, vol. 112(479), pp. 433–458.
  5. Davidson D. 1974. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme, “Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association”, vol. 47, pp. 5–20.
  6. Donati P. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, Routledge.
  7. Foster G.M. 1967. Peasant Society and the Image of Limited Good, [in:] Peasant Society: A Reader, eds. J.M. Potter, M.N. Diaz, G.M. Foster, Little, Brown and Company, pp. 300–323.
  8. Friedman J. 2009. A Crisis of Politics, Not Economics: Complexity, Ignorance, and Policy Failure, “Critical Review”, vol. 21(2–3), pp. 127–183.
  9. Gadamer H.-G. 1996. Vérité et méthode. Les grandes lignes d’une hermeneutique philosophique, Éditions du Seuil.
  10. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, “American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 91(3), pp. 481–510.
  11. Greenfeld L. 2006. Nationalism and the Mind, Oneworld.
  12. Hall J.A. 2013. The Importance of Being Civil: The Struggle for Political Decency, Princeton University Press.
  13. Jaeger W. 1986. Demóstenes, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  14. Kojève A. 1947. Introduction à la lecture de Hegel, Gallimard.
  15. Lamont M. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Imagination, Harvard University Press.
  16. MacIntyre A. 2006. The Tasks of Philosophy, Selected Essays, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press.
  17. March J.G., Olsen J.P. 1995. Democratic Governance, Free Press.
  18. Morris I., Manning J.G. 2005. Introduction, [in:] The Ancient Economy: Evidence and Models, eds. J.G. Manning, I. Morris, Stanford University Press, pp. 1–44.
  19. Nora P., ed. 1997. Les lieux de mémoire 2, Gallimard.
  20. Perelman C., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. 1971. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press.
  21. Pérez-Díaz V. 1980. Introducción a la Sociología: ensayo sobre la ciencia social en su historia, Alianza.
  22. Pérez-Díaz V. 1991. Structure and Change of Castilian Peasant Communities: A Sociological Inquiry into Rural Castile 1550–1990, Garland.
  23. Pérez-Díaz V. 2008. El malestar de la democracia, Crítica.
  24. Pérez-Díaz V. 2013. Introduction: The Crisis in Europe and the Euro Problem, [in:] Europe and the Global Crisis, ed. V. Pérez-Díaz, Gota a Gota, pp. 9–39.
  25. Pérez-Díaz V. 2014. Civil Society: A Multi-Layered Concept, “Current Sociology”, vol. 62(6), pp. 812–830.
  26. Pérez-Díaz V. 2015. La intensidad de agencia, su anclaje and su paisaje: clase obrera y elites, mercado de trabajo and cultura en la España actual, [in:] V. Pérez- Díaz, J.C. Rodríguez, J.P. López-Novo, E. Chuliá, Agentes sociales, cultura and tejido productivo en la España actual, Funcas, pp. 17–87.
  27. Pérez-Díaz V. 2017. The Voice of Society in the Face of the Crisis, Funcas. Available at: https://www.funcas.es/publicaciones/Sumario. aspx?IdRef=24-24003, accessed 10.10.2017.
  28. Pérez-Díaz V., Mezo J., Rodríguez J.C. 2012. La crisis y las autonomías. La sociedad española ante la crisis económica y el sistema de las autonomías, Funcas.
  29. Pérez-Díaz V., Rodríguez J.C. 2010. Alerta and desconfiada. La sociedad española ante la crisis, Funcas.
  30. Polanyi K. 2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Beacon Press.
  31. Putnam R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster.
  32. Quine W.v.O. 1960. Word and Object, MIT Press.
  33. Smelser N.J. 1998. The Rational and the Ambivalent in the Social Sciences: 1997 Presidential Address, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 63(1), pp. 1–16.
  34. Smelser N.J., Swedberg R. 2005. Introducing Economic Sociology, [in:] The Handbook of Economic Sociology, eds. N.J. Smelser, R. Swedberg, 2nd ed., Prince-ton University Press, Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 3–25.
  35. Smith P.D. 2002. The Virtue of Civility in the Practice of Politics, University Press of America.
  36. Streeck W. 2014. How Will Capitalism End?, “New Left Review”, vol. 89, pp. 35–64.
  37. Tetlock P.E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know, Princeton University Press.
  38. Thompson E.P. 1971. The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century, “Past and Present”, vol. 50(1), pp. 76–136.
  39. Wuthnow R. 2005. New Directions in the Study of Religion and Economic Life, [in:] The Handbook of Economic Sociology, eds. N.J. Smelser, R. Swedberg, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 603–626.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.