Reflexivity and the Symbolic We-Relation

Lorenza   Gattamorta

doi:10.51196/srz.12.7

Artykuły

Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii

Reflexivity and the Symbolic We-Relation

Lorenza Gattamorta

PDF (Angielski)

Przesłane: 22 May 2020
Opublikowane: 01-04-2017

Abstrakt

This essay considers the features constituting the symbolic We-relation to seek how the reflexive Self can generate changes to the Self, the You, and the We-relation itself. While critically dialoguing with phenomenological and pragmatist social theories, the essay investigates how subjectivity emerges in the interaction with (verbal and non-verbal) symbols and tries to avoid both subjectivism and the relationism.

Bibliografia

Alexander J.C. 1987. Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II, Columbia University Press.
Alexander J.C., Smith P. 2002. The Strong Program in Cultural Theory: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics, [in:] Handbook of Sociological Theory, ed. J.H. Turner, Kluwer Academic, pp. 135–150.
Archer M.S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge University Press.
Archer M.S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge University Press.
Archer M., Donati P. 2015. The Relational Subject, Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard J. 1993. Symbolic Exchange and Death, Sage Publications.
Bourdieu P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, Polity Press.
Colapietro V.M. 1989. Peirce’s Approach to the Self, State University of New York Press.
Donati P. 2002. Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale, 6th ed., FrancoAngeli.
Donati P. 2008. Oltre il multiculturalismo. La ragione relazionale per un mondo comune, Laterza.
Donati P. 2009. Teoria relazionale della società: i concetti di base, FrancoAngeli.
Donati P. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, Routledge.
Donati P. 2015. Manifesto for a Critical Realist Relational Sociology, “International Review of Sociology”, vol. 25(1), pp. 86–109.
Gattamorta L. 2010. La società e i suoi simboli, Carocci.
Habermas J. 1988. On the Logic of the Social Sciences, MIT Press.
Hałas E., ed. 2002a. Symbols, Power and Politics, Peter Lang.
Hałas E. 2002b. Symbolism and Social Phenomena: Toward the Integration of Past and Current Theoretical Approaches, “European Journal of Social Theory”, vol. 5(3), pp. 351–366.
Hawkes T. 1977. Structuralism and Semiotics, Routledge.
Iser W. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ivana G.I. 2016. Present Contemporaries and Absent Consociates: Rethinking Schütz’s “We Relation” Beyond Copresence, “Human Studies”, vol. 4, pp. 513–531.
Mead G.H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist, University of Chicago Press.
Peirce C.S. 1931–58. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., Harvard University Press.
Schütz A. 1942. Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, vol. 2(3), pp. 323–347.
Schütz A. 1951. Making Music Together: A Study in Social Relationship, “So¬cial Research”, vol. 18(1), pp. 76–97.
Schütz A. 1956. Mozart and the Philosophers, “Social Research”, vol. 23(2), pp. 219–242.
Schütz A. 1972. Symbol, Reality and Society, [in:] Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 287–356.
Schütz A., Luckmann T. 1975. Die Strukturen der Lebenswelt I, Luchterhand [Eng. transl.: The Structures of the Life-World I, transl. R.M. Zaner, H.T. Engelhardt Jr., Northwestern University Press, 1973.]
Simon H.A. 1990. Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford University Press.
Sperber D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism, Cambridge University Press.
Wagner R. 1986. Symbols that Stand for Themselves, University of Chicago Press.
Wiley N. 1994. The Semiotic Self, Polity Press.
Houghton Library, Harvard University: Charles S. Peirce Papers, 1787– 1951 (MS Am 1632): MS 290, Peirce C.S. 1839–1914. Issues of Pragmaticism (CP).
Houghton Library, Harvard University: Charles S. Peirce Papers, 1787– 1951 (MS Am 1632): MS 318, Peirce C.S. 1839–1914. Pragmatism (Prag).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Słowa kluczowe

reflexive Self
We-relation
rationality
sociology of symbolic process

Jak cytować

Gattamorta, L. . (2017). Reflexivity and the Symbolic We-Relation. Stan Rzeczy, 1(12), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.12.7

Share

Podobne artykuły

Aleksander Manterys, Relational Sociology Paradigms , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii
Emiliana Mangone, Risk According to the Relational Theory of Society , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii
Monika Strupiechowska, Pojęcie herezji jako narzędzie sprawowania władzy w dyskursie medialnym , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(18) (2020): Herezja
Andrei Dudchik, The Birth of Sociology from the Spirit of (Critique of Bourgeois) Philosophy? The Belarusian Case in the 1960s through 1980s , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 2(13) (2017): Socjologia w realnym socjalizmie
Stefania Giada Meda, Giovanna Rossi, Donatella Bramanti , A Relational Sociological Approach to Active Ageing: The Role of Intergenerational Relations and Social Generativity , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii
Stefan Bosomitu , Sociology versus Ideology in Communist Romania: Sociology’s Re-Emergence and Role , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 2(13) (2017): Socjologia w realnym socjalizmie
Irena Szlachcicowa, After the Relational Turn: The Problem of Social Identity , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii
Tomasz Warczok, Tomasz Zarycki, (Ukryte) zaangażowanie i (pozorna) neutralność: Strukturalne ograniczenia rozwoju socjologii krytycznej w warunkach półperyferyjnych , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(6) (2014): Polityka prawdy
Elżbieta Ciżewska-Martyńska, Towards a Hopeful University , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 1(24) (2023): New Sociology of Leadership
Elżbieta Hałas, Między odrzuceniem religii a zbawianiem świata: itineraria socjologii i postsekularnej teorii społecznej , Stan Rzeczy: Nr 2(5) (2013): Postsekularyzmy

1-10 z 161 Następny

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.

[1] Alexander J.C. 1987. Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II, Columbia University Press.

[2] Alexander J.C., Smith P. 2002. The Strong Program in Cultural Theory: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics, [in:] Handbook of Sociological Theory, ed. J.H. Turner, Kluwer Academic, pp. 135–150.

[3] Archer M.S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge University Press.

[4] Archer M.S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge University Press.

[5] Archer M., Donati P. 2015. The Relational Subject, Cambridge University Press.

[6] Baudrillard J. 1993. Symbolic Exchange and Death, Sage Publications.

[7] Bourdieu P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, Polity Press.

[8] Colapietro V.M. 1989. Peirce’s Approach to the Self, State University of New York Press.

[9] Donati P. 2002. Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale, 6th ed., FrancoAngeli.

[10] Donati P. 2008. Oltre il multiculturalismo. La ragione relazionale per un mondo comune, Laterza.

[11] Donati P. 2009. Teoria relazionale della società: i concetti di base, FrancoAngeli.

[12] Donati P. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, Routledge.

[13] Donati P. 2015. Manifesto for a Critical Realist Relational Sociology, “International Review of Sociology”, vol. 25(1), pp. 86–109.

[14] Gattamorta L. 2010. La società e i suoi simboli, Carocci.

[15] Habermas J. 1988. On the Logic of the Social Sciences, MIT Press.

[16] Hałas E., ed. 2002a. Symbols, Power and Politics, Peter Lang.

[17] Hałas E. 2002b. Symbolism and Social Phenomena: Toward the Integration of Past and Current Theoretical Approaches, “European Journal of Social Theory”, vol. 5(3), pp. 351–366.

[18] Hawkes T. 1977. Structuralism and Semiotics, Routledge.

[19] Iser W. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

[20] Ivana G.I. 2016. Present Contemporaries and Absent Consociates: Rethinking Schütz’s “We Relation” Beyond Copresence, “Human Studies”, vol. 4, pp. 513–531.

[21] Mead G.H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist, University of Chicago Press.

[22] Peirce C.S. 1931–58. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., Harvard University Press.

[23] Schütz A. 1942. Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, vol. 2(3), pp. 323–347.

[24] Schütz A. 1951. Making Music Together: A Study in Social Relationship, “So¬cial Research”, vol. 18(1), pp. 76–97.

[25] Schütz A. 1956. Mozart and the Philosophers, “Social Research”, vol. 23(2), pp. 219–242.

[26] Schütz A. 1972. Symbol, Reality and Society, [in:] Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 287–356.

[27] Schütz A., Luckmann T. 1975. Die Strukturen der Lebenswelt I, Luchterhand [Eng. transl.: The Structures of the Life-World I, transl. R.M. Zaner, H.T. Engelhardt Jr., Northwestern University Press, 1973.]

[28] Simon H.A. 1990. Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford University Press.

[29] Sperber D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism, Cambridge University Press.

[30] Wagner R. 1986. Symbols that Stand for Themselves, University of Chicago Press.

[31] Wiley N. 1994. The Semiotic Self, Polity Press.

[32] Houghton Library, Harvard University: Charles S. Peirce Papers, 1787– 1951 (MS Am 1632): MS 290, Peirce C.S. 1839–1914. Issues of Pragmaticism (CP).

[33] Houghton Library, Harvard University: Charles S. Peirce Papers, 1787– 1951 (MS Am 1632): MS 318, Peirce C.S. 1839–1914. Pragmatism (Prag).