common.pageHeaderLogo.altText674f42f888ec1

Artykuły

Nr 1(12) (2017): Zwrot relacyjny w socjologii

Risk According to the Relational Theory of Society

  • Emiliana Mangone
Przesłane
22 May 2020
Opublikowane
01-04-2017

Abstrakt

Taking social relations into consideration allows us to be mindful of the life-world and the social system. A social relation should be intended as an emergent phenomenon of a mutual act, with an autonomous connotation that goes beyond those who implement it. At the same time, it can be traced back to referential semantics, as it exists within a framework of symbolic meaning, and to structural semantics, because it is at the same time a resource and a constraint for the social system. If these are the general foundations of the relational theory of society, adding risk to this perspective as a descriptive model has some distinguishing features. For example, as a dimension of everyday life it is a “neutral category.” It is based on that “insecure security” whose results, positive or negative, will derive from the kind of balance established between “resources and challenges” or, as we claim in this paper, between “goals and means.”

Bibliografia

  1. Archer M.S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Barbieri A.S.A., Mangone E. 2015. Il rischio tra fascinazione e precauzione, FrancoAngeli.
  3. Bauman Z. 1999. In Search of Politics, Polity Press.
  4. Beck U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Suhrkamp.
  5. Carrà E. 1992. “Rischio”: analisi di un concetto sociologico, “Studi di Sociologia”, vol. 30(1), pp. 47–59.
  6. Carrà Mittini E., Santoro M. 2006. “Rischio”, [in:] Sociologia della cultura, eds. S. Belardinelli, L. Allodi, FrancoAngeli, pp.193–210.
  7. Collins R. 1988. Theoretical Sociology, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  8. Cuche D. 1996. La notion de culture dans les sciences sociales, La Découverte.
  9. Donati P. 1990. Famiglia e infanzia in una società rischiosa. Come leggere e affrontare il senso del rischio, “Marginalità e società”, vol. 14, pp. 7–38.
  10. Donati P. 1991. Teoria relazionale della società, FrancoAngeli.
  11. Donati P. 1993. Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale, FrancoAngeli.
  12. Donati P. 2011a. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, Routledge.
  13. Donati P. 2011b. Modernization and Relational Reflexivity, “International Review of Sociology – Revue Internationale de Sociologie”, vol. 21(1), pp. 21–39, doi: 10.1080/03906701.2011.544178, accessed 28.07.2017.
  14. Donati P. 2011c. Sociologia della riflessività. Come si entra nel dopo-moderno, il Mulino.
  15. Donati P., Archer M. 2015. The Relational Subject, Cambridge University Press.
  16. Douglas M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, Penguin Books.
  17. Douglas M. 1985. Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences, Russel Sage Foundation.
  18. Douglas M. 1992. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, Routledge.
  19. Douglas M. 1997. The Depoliticisation of Risk, [in:] Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky, eds. R.J. Ellis, M. Thompson, Westview, pp. 121–132.
  20. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. 1983. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers, University of California Press.
  21. Ewald F. 1993. Two Infinities of Risk, [in:] The Politics of Everyday Fear, ed. B. Massumi, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 221–228.
  22. Festinger L. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press.
  23. Giddens A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University Press.
  24. Griswold W. 1994. Cultures and Societies in a Changing World, Pine Forge Press.
  25. Hall S. 1997. The Centrality of Culture: Notes on the Cultural Revolutions of Our Time, [in:] Media and Cultural Regulation, ed. K. Thompson, Sage Publications, pp. 207–238.
  26. Haverkate M., D’Ancona F., Giambi C., Johansen K., Lopalco P.L., Cozza V., Appelgren E., on behalf of the VENICE project gatekeepers and contact points. 2012. Mandatory and Recommended Vaccination in the EU, Iceland and Norway: Results of the VENICE 2010 Survey on the Ways of Implementing National Vaccination Programmes, “Euro Surveillance”, vol. 17(22), pp. 1–6.
  27. Lerche I., Glaesser W. 2006. Environmental Risk Assessment: Quantitative Measures, Anthropogenic Influences, Human Impact, Springer.
  28. Luhmann N. 1991. Soziologie des Risikos, de Gruyter.
  29. Lupton D. 1999. Risk, Routledge.
  30. Mangone E. 2013. La professione medica tra “essere”, “fare” e “sapere relazionale”, “Sociologia e Politiche Sociali”, vol. 16(2), pp. 163–180.
  31. Merton R.K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press.
  32. Schütz A. 1932. Der Sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt, Springer.
  33. Tansey J., O’Riordan T. 1999. Cultural Theory and Risk: A Review, “Health, Risk & Society”, vol. 1(1), pp. 71–90.
  34. Terenzi P., Boccacin L., Prandini R., eds. 2016. Lessico della sociologia relazionale, il Mulino.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1-10 z 180

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.