##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

No. 1(12) (2017): The Relational Turn in Sociology: Implications for the Study of Society, Culture, and Persons

Sociologies of Everyday Life: From Alienation to the Production of Meaning

  • Paolo Terenzi
Submitted
22 May 2020
Published
01-04-2017

Abstract

This paper analyses the concept of everyday life as formulated in relational sociology. It shows that Pierpaolo Donati’s historical analysis of the dualist nature of everyday life is similar to that of Alvin Gouldner but that the two authors’ approaches differ in terms of the possibility of overcoming this dualism. From the perspective of relational sociology, sociological interpretations of everyday life can be traced to two paradigms. The first is the Marxist paradigm, in which everyday life is primarily characterized by forms of alienation. The second is the phenomenological paradigm, in which everyday life primarily consists of producing meaning. The first paradigm examines stories and cultures of subordinate social groups, and denounces domination and alienation in everyday life. The second paradigm examines the common-sense world, and how it is taken for granted, structured, and inter-subjective. Relational sociology seeks to overcome these two paradigms by highlighting their aporias, and considers alienation to be the outcome of a deep division between the ultimate meaning of life and the culture of everyday life. While in order to overcome this dualism, Gouldner offers an immanent reading of everyday life, relational sociology tries to show how in everyday life the relationship between social practices and culture may give rise to a new form of secularism that is accepting of non-fundamentalist aspects of religious belief.

References

  1. Arendt H. 1978. The Life of the Mind, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  2. Beck U. 2008. World at Risk, Polity Press.
  3. Berger P., Luckmann T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin Books.
  4. Boudon R. 2007. Renouveler la democratie. Éloge du sens commun, Odile Jacob.
  5. Bregman R. 2017. Utopia for Realists: How We Can Build the Ideal World, Little, Brown and Company.
  6. Bronner G. 2016. La pensée extrême. Comment des hommes ordinaires devien¬nent des fanatiques, Puf.
  7. Chafuen A. 2003. Faith and Liberty: The Economic Thought of the Late Scholastics, Lexington Books.
  8. Chrostowska S.D., Ingram J.D. 2017. Political Uses of Utopia. New Marxist, Anarchist, and Radical Democratic Perspectives, Columbia University Press.
  9. Donati P. 2002a. Religion and Democracy: The Challenge of a ‘Religiously Qualified’ Public Sphere, “Polish Sociological Review”, vol. 138, pp. 147–173.
  10. Donati P. 2002b. Senso e valore della vita quotidiana, “Annales Theologici”, vol. 16(1) , pp. 55–110.
  11. Donati P. 2012. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, Routledge.
  12. Dreher R. 2017. The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post- Christian Nation, Sentinel.
  13. Featherstone M. 1992. The Heroic Life and Everyday Life, “Theory, Culture and Society”, vol. 9(1), pp. 159–182.
  14. Gardiner M.E. 2000. Critiques of Everyday Life: An Introduction, Rout¬ledge.
  15. Gardiner M.E. 2006. Marxism and the Convergence of Utopia and the Everyday, “History of the Human Sciences”, vol. 3, pp. 1–32.
  16. Geertz C. 1983. Common Sense as a Cultural System, [in:] Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, Basic Books, pp. 73-93.
  17. Gouldner A. 1975. The Sociology and Everyday Life, [in:] The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of R.K. Merton, ed. L. Coser, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 417–432.
  18. Heller A. 2012. The Concept of Beauty, Lexington Books.
  19. Heller A. 2016. Everyday Life, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  20. Hurdley R. 2016. Everyday Life: The Making of a Sociological Topic, Then Making it ‘Cultural Sociology’, [in:] The Sage Handbook of Cultural Sociology, eds. D. Inglis, A.M. Almila, Sage Publications, pp. 372–389.
  21. Joas H. 2014. Faith as an Option, Stanford University Press.
  22. Johnson D.P. 2008. Phenomenological Sociology and Ethnomethodology: The Everyday Life World of Common Sense, [in:] Contemporary Sociological Theory: An Integrated Multi-Level Approach, Springer, pp. 137–163.
  23. Kalekin-Fishman D. 2013. Sociology of Everyday Life, “Current Sociology”, vol. 61(5–6), pp. 714–732.
  24. Krehan C. 2016. Gramsci’s Common Sense: Inequality and Its Narratives, Duke University Press.
  25. Lasch C. 1995. Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged, W.W. Norton & Company.
  26. Le Breton D. 2013. Conduites à risque, Puf.
  27. Lefebvre H. 2014. Critique of Everyday Life, Verso.
  28. Maycroft N. 1996. Marxism and Everyday Life, “Studies in Marxism”, vol. 3, pp. 71–91.
  29. Neal S., Murji K., eds. 2015. Sociologies of Everyday Life, Special Issue of “Sociology”, vol. 49(5), pp. 811–819.
  30. Nussbaum M. 2001. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.
  31. Pollner M. 2010. Mundane Reason, Cambridge University Press.
  32. Schütz A. 1972. Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action, [in:] Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  33. Sztompka P. 2008. The Focus on Everyday Life: a New Turn in Sociology, “European Review”, vol. 16(1), pp. 1–15.
  34. Turkle S. 2011. Alone Together, Basic Books.
  35. Zerubavel E. 1985. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life, University of California Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 177

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.