Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 1(1) (2011): Demons in the Social Sciences

Social Scienes and the Presence of Philosophy

  • Tadeusz Szawiel
Submitted
9 June 2020
Published
01-11-2011

Abstract

The main claim of the article is that what counts as the contribution of philosophy is present in the sciences (and humanities) on two levels. The first one can be described as the level of paradigmatic achievements. It includes the most general theoretical conditions, notions, and methods delimiting object of the science, what counts as a relevant fact and what are the fundamental research problems. Examples of such achievements are modern science (Gallilei), modern social philosophy (Hobbes) and philosophies of history (M. Weber, C. Schmitt). Characteristic of paradigmatic achievements is the instantaneousness (coincidence) of science and philosophy which precisely excludes the very possibility of a planned and controlled “encounter” of science and philosophy because at the very moment of the origin of the new paradigm “that” science and “that” philosophy do not yet exist (e.g. at the beginning of XVII century). The second level concerns the internal problems in sciences in moments when theories cease to be effective research tools or when the research questions are pushed beyond limits of existing approaches. And these are the situations which make place for philosophical reflection. A detailed analysis of two examples shows what exactly the contribution of philosophy might be in such a situation.

References

  1. Czarnowski, S. 1958. Kultura religijna wiejskiego ludu polskiego. W: Tenże. Kultura. Warszawa: PWN.
  2. Habermas, J. 2005. Faktyczność i obowiązywanie. Teoria dyskursu wobec zagadnień prawa i demokratycznego państwa prawnego. Przeł. Romaniuk A., Marszałek R. Warszawa: SCHOLAR.
  3. Heidegger, M. 2001. Pytanie o rzecz. Przeł. Mizera J. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
  4. Mehring, R. 2009. Carl Schmitt, Aufstieg und Fall. Eine Biographie. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
  5. Peters, R.S., 1997. Introduction. W: Hobbes T. Leviathan. Oakeshott M. (red.). New York: A Touchstone Book.
  6. Putnam, R.D. 2007. E pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. „Scandinavian Political Studies” 30 (2).
  7. Schmitt, C. 1923. Soziologie des Souveränitätsbegriffs und Politische Theologie. W: Palyi, M. (red.). Hauptprobleme der Soziologie. Erinnerungsgabe für Max Weber. München.
  8. Schmitt, C. 2000. Teologia polityczna i inne pisma. Przeł. Cichocki, M.A. Kraków–Warszawa: Znak–Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.
  9. Schmitt, C. 2002. Das Zeitalter der Neutralisierungen. W: Der Begriff des Politischen. Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  10. Schmitt, C. 2002a. Ex Captivitate Salus. Erfahrungen der Zeit 1945/47. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  11. Schmitt, C. 2005. Die Einheit der Welt. W: Maschke, G. (red.). Frieden oder Pazifismus? Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  12. Szawiel, T. 2008. Religijność ludowa: perspektywy spojrzenia. „Znak” 3/2008.
  13. Taubes, J. 1987. Ad Carl Schmitt. Gegenstrebige Fügung. Berlin: Merve Verlag.
  14. Taylor, Ch. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Taylor, Ch. 2001. Źródła podmiotowości. Narodziny tożsamości nowoczesnej. Warszawa: PWN.
  16. Weber, M. 1994. Etyka protestancka a duch kapitalizmu. Przeł. Miziński J. Lublin: TEST.
  17. Wittgenstein, L. 1998. Uwagi o „Złotej Gałęzi” Frazera. Przeł. Orzechowski A. Warszawa: Instytut Kultury.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 75

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.