logo

Artykuły

Nr 1(26) (2024): New Energy Regimes

Transforming Energy Systems, Transforming Social Science: Social Researchers and Collective Experimentation in Action

Przesłane
15 July 2024
Opublikowane
11-09-2025

Abstrakt

The accelerating climate change and biodiversity crisis necessitate an unprecedented mobilisation of resources for a sustainable transition. This article explores how the anticipated contribution of social science to this transition requires a redefinition of social researchers’ roles. Drawing on sustainable transition studies, actor–network theory’s concept of translation, and insights from a transdisciplinary research project supporting stakeholder-driven solutions, we offer recommendations for researchers engaged in similar endeavours. We demonstrate how the need for simultaneous modifications of attitudes, interests, institutions, and infrastructure within sustainable solutions also applies to the organisation of scientific research itself.

Bibliografia

  1. Bauwens T., Schraven D., Drewing E., Radtke J., Holstenkamp L., Gotchev B., Yildiz Ö. 2022. “Conceptualizing Community in Energy Systems: A Systematic Review of 183 Definitions,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 156, 111999, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111999.
  2. Bińczyk E. 2018. Epoka Człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  3. Bińczyk E. 2024. Uspołecznianie antropocenu. Ekowerwa i ekologizowanie ekonomii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
  4. Ceglia F., Esposito P., Marrasso E., Sasso M. 2020. “From Smart Energy Community to Smart Energy Municipalities: Literature Review, Agendas and Pathways,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 254, 120118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120118.
  5. Chilvers J., Pallett H., Hargreaves T. 2018. “Ecologies of Participation in Socio-Technical Change: The Case of Energy System Transitions,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 42, pp. 199–210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020.
  6. Cherp A., Vinichenko V., Jewell J., Brutschin E., Sovacool B. 2018. “Integrating Techno-Economic, Socio-Technical and Political Perspectives on National Energy Transitions: A Meta-Theoretical Framework,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 37, pp. 175–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015.
  7. Dańkowska A., Niedziółka T., Stasik A. 2024. Report on the Three Series of Participatory Workshops with Local Stakeholders, Green Heat.
  8. Dańkowska A., Stasik A., Niedziółka T., Dembek A. 2025. “Getting Warmed Up: Challenges to Participatory Decarbonization of a Local Residential Heating System in Poland,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 55, 100959, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100959.
  9. Dembek A., Dańkowska A., Starzyński P., Stasik A. 2021. Green Heat Pilot Project in Legionowo: Working Conceptualization Report, Green Heat.
  10. Dembek A., Dańkowska A., Stasik A., Niedziółka T. 2022. Report on Local Conditions and Needs’ Diagnosis, Green Heat.
  11. Di Lucia L., Ericsson K. 2014. “Low-Carbon District Heating in Sweden – Examining a Successful Energy Transition,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 4, pp. 10–20.
  12. Frankowski J. 2020. “Attention: Smog Alert! Citizen Engagement for Clean Air and Its Consequences for Fuel Poverty in Poland,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 207, 109525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109525.
  13. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J.R. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age,” Futures, vol. 25(7), pp. 739–755.
  14. Geels F. 2011. “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 1(1), pp. 24–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
  15. Grübler A. 2012. “Grand Designs: Historical Patterns and Future Scenarios of Energy Technological Change,” [in:] The Global Energy Assessment, eds. A. Grübler, F. Aguayo, K.S. Gallagher, M. Hekkert, K. Jiang, L. Mytelka, L. Neij, G. Nemet, C. Wilson, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1713–1786.
  16. Gui E.M., MacGill I. 2018. “Typology of Future Clean Energy Communities: An Exploratory Structure, Opportunities, and Challenges,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 35, pp. 94–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.019.
  17. GUS. 2023. Zużycie energii w gospodarstwach domowych w 2021 r. Informacje sygnalne, https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko-energia/energia/zuzycie-energii-w-gospodarstwach-domowych-w-2021-roku,2,5.html, accessed: 4.06.2025.
  18. Hand D., Mannila H., Smyth P. 2005. Eksploracja danych, Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne.
  19. Hausner J., Krzykawski M., eds. 2023. Gospodarka i entropia. Jak wyjść z polikryzysu?, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  20. Healy S. 2011. “Post-Normal Science in Post-Normal Times,” Futures, vol. 43(2), pp. 202–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.10.009.
  21. Hening D., Knight D.M. 2023. “Polycrisis: Prompts for an Emerging Worldview,” Anthropology Today, vol. 29(2), pp. 3–6.
  22. Homer-Dixon T., Renn O., Rockstrom J., Donges J.F., Janzwood S. 2021. A Call for an International Research Program on the Risk of a Global Polycrisis, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4058592, accessed: 4.06.2025.
  23. Hossain M., Leminen S., Westerlund M. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 213, pp. 976–988, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257.
  24. Huang M.T., Zhai P.M. 2021. “Achieving Paris Agreement Temperature Goals Requires Carbon Neutrality by Middle Century with Far-Reaching Transitions in the Whole Society,” Advances in Climate Change Research, vol. 12(2), pp. 281–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2021.03.004.
  25. IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Cambridge University Press.
  26. Kern F., Rogge K.S. 2016. “The Pace of Governed Energy Transitions: Agency, International Dynamics and the Global Paris Agreement Accelerating Decarbonisation Processes?,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 22, pp. 13–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.016.
  27. Klein S.J.W., Coffey S. 2016. “Building a Sustainable Energy Future, One Community at a Time,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 60, pp. 867–880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.129.
  28. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press.
  29. LeRouge C., Ma J., Sneha S., Tolle K. 2013. “User Profiles and Personas in the Design and Development of Consumer Health Technologies,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 82(11), e251–e268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006.
  30. Loorbach D., Frantzeskaki N., Avelino F. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 42, pp. 599–626, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
  31. Markard, J., Geels, F.W., Raven R. 2020. “Challenges in the Acceleration of Sustainability Transitions,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 1 (8), https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468.
  32. McLoughlin E. 2024. “Protesting the Future: The Evolution of the European Farmer,” Anthropology Today, vol. 40(5), pp. 3–6, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12911.
  33. Nielsen L., 2012. Personas: User Focused Design. Human–Computer Interaction, Springer.
  34. Roberts C., Geels F., Lockwood M., Newell P., Schmitz H., Turnheim B., Jordan A. 2018. “The Politics of Accelerating Low-Carbon Transitions: Towards a New Research Agenda,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 40, pp. 304–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.001.
  35. Rosenberg N. 1976. Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge University Press.
  36. Ruggiero S., Martiskainen M., Onkila T. 2018. “Understanding the Scaling-Up of Community Energy Niches through Strategic Niche Management Theory: Insights from Finland,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 170, pp. 581–590, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.144
  37. Ryghaug M., Skjølsvold T.M., Heidenreich S. 2018. “Creating Energy Citizenship through Material Participation,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 48(2), pp. 283–303.
  38. Schot J., Geels F.W. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 20(5), pp. 537–554, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651.
  39. Schot J., Kanger L. 2018. “Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality,” Research Policy, vol. 47(6), pp. 1045-1059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009.
  40. Schreuer A. 2016. “The Establishment of Citizen Power Plants in Austria: A Process of Empowerment?,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 13, pp. 126–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.003.
  41. Sengers F., Wieczorek A.J., Raven R. 2016. “Experimenting for Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Literature Review,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 145, pp. 153–164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.
  42. Sovacool B.K., Brugger H., Brunzema I., Dańkowska A., Wemyss D., Vernay A.L., Betz R., Avelino F., de Geus T., Dembek A., et al. 2023. “Social Innovation Supports Inclusive and Accelerated Energy Transitions with Appropriate Governance,” Communications Earth and Environment, vol. 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00952-w.
  43. Sokołowski J., Frankowski J., Lewandowski P. 2023. “Energy Poverty, Housing Conditions, and Self-Assessed Health: Evidence from Poland,” Housing Studies, vol. 39(9), pp. 2325–2354, https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2176831.
  44. Stasik A. 2024. Przełamać węglowy klincz. Zbiorowe eksperymentowanie na rzecz zrównoważonej transformacji, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  45. Stasik A., Dańkowska A. 2023. “Multiscalar Institutional Work of System-Building Sustainable Entrepreneurs in Transitioning Coal Regions: Case of Energy Cluster,” Social Entrepreneurship Review, vol. 1, pp. 2–18.
  46. Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockström J., Cornell S.E., Fetzer I., Bennett E.M., Biggs R., Carpenter S.R., Vries W. de, Wit C.A. de. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet,” Science, vol. 347, 6223, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
  47. Stojilovska A., Yoon H., Frankowski J. 2024. “Enough Pain, Cold, and Illness! Social Movements in Response to Energy Poverty in Europe,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 115, 103627, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103627.
  48. Truffer B., Störmer E., Maurer M., Ruef A. 2010. “Local Strategic Planning Processes and Sustainability Transitions in Infrastructure Sectors,” Environmental Policy and Governance, vol. 20, pp. 258–269.
  49. Unruh G.C. 2000. “Understanding Carbon Lock-In,” Energy Policy, vol. 28, pp. 817–830, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2.
  50. Vernay A.L., Sebi C., Arroyo F. 2023. “Energy Community Business Models and Their Impact on the Energy Transition: Lessons Learnt from France,” Energy Policy, vol. 175, 113473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113473.
  51. Wahlund M., Palm J. 2022. “The Role of Energy Democracy and Energy Citizenship for Participatory Energy Transitions: A Comprehensive Review,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 87, 102482, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482.
  52. Wittmayer J.M., Hielscher S., Fraaije M., Avelino F., Rogge K. 2022. “A Typology for Unpacking the Diversity of Social Innovation in Energy Transitions,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 88, 102513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102513.
  53. World Bank. 2012. Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4 Degrees Warmer World Must Be Avoided, https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/865571468149107611/turn-down-the-heat-why-a-4-c-warmer-world-must-be-avoided, accessed: 4.06.2025.
  54. Zarańska K. 2015. “Analiza skupień jako narzędzie wspomagające budowę person w projektowaniu stron internetowych, na przykładzie badania wykorzystania urządzeń mobilnych,” Studia i Materiały Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Zarządzania Wiedzą, vol. 75, pp. 111–125.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

11-20 z 102

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.