Phenomenology as a Possibility of Social Thought:  Elżbieta Hałas (ed.), “Life-World, Intersubjectivity and Culture: Contemporary Dilemmas”

Dorota  	Wolska

doi:10.51196/srz.13.17

Recenzje

Nr 2(13) (2017): Socjologia w realnym socjalizmie

Phenomenology as a Possibility of Social Thought: Elżbieta Hałas (ed.), “Life-World, Intersubjectivity and Culture: Contemporary Dilemmas”

Dorota Wolska

PDF (English)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.13.17
Przesłane: 23 maja 2020
Opublikowane: 01-11-2017

Bibliografia

Dewey J. 1954 [1927]. The Public and Its Problems, Swallow Press.
Grathoff R. 1970. The Structure of Social Inconsistencies: A Contribution to a Unified Theory of Play, Game, and Social Action. Martinus Nijhoff.
Hałas E., ed. 2016. Life-World, Intersubjectivity and Culture: Contemporary Dilemmas, Peter Lang.
Heidegger M. 1969. “Mein Weg in Phänomenologie,” [in:] M. Heidegger, Zur Sache des Denkens, Niemeyer, pp. 81–90.
Hickok G. 2014. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition, W.W. Norton & Company.
Kil A., Małczyński J., Wolska D., eds. 2015. Prace Kulturoznawcze XVIII. Kultura nie-ludzka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Lippmann W. 1993 [1925], The Phantom Public, Transaction Publishers.
Lyotard J-M. 1991 [1954]. Phenomenology, transl. B. Beakley, SUNY Press.
Przyłębski A. 2003. “Przyszłość fenomenologii. Rozmowa z Ferdinandem Fellmannem,” Fenomenologia, vol. 1(1), pp. 37–48.
Rabinow P. 2006. “Steps Toward an Anthropological Laboratory,” ARC Concept Note, vol. 1, http://anthropos-lab.net/wp/publications/2007/08/conceptnoteno1.pdf, accessed 27.07.2016.
Raulet G. 2006. La philosophie allemande depuis 1945, Armand Colin.
Schütz A. 1964. “Don Quixote and the Problem of Reality,” [in:] A. Schütz, Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 136–158.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Jak cytować

Wolska, D. . (2017). Phenomenology as a Possibility of Social Thought: Elżbieta Hałas (ed.), “Life-World, Intersubjectivity and Culture: Contemporary Dilemmas”. Stan Rzeczy, (2(13), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.13.17

[1] Dewey J. 1954 [1927]. The Public and Its Problems, Swallow Press.

[2] Grathoff R. 1970. The Structure of Social Inconsistencies: A Contribution to a Unified Theory of Play, Game, and Social Action. Martinus Nijhoff.

[3] Hałas E., ed. 2016. Life-World, Intersubjectivity and Culture: Contemporary Dilemmas, Peter Lang.

[4] Heidegger M. 1969. “Mein Weg in Phänomenologie,” [in:] M. Heidegger, Zur Sache des Denkens, Niemeyer, pp. 81–90.

[5] Hickok G. 2014. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition, W.W. Norton & Company.

[6] Kil A., Małczyński J., Wolska D., eds. 2015. Prace Kulturoznawcze XVIII. Kultura nie-ludzka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

[7] Lippmann W. 1993 [1925], The Phantom Public, Transaction Publishers.

[8] Lyotard J-M. 1991 [1954]. Phenomenology, transl. B. Beakley, SUNY Press.

[9] Przyłębski A. 2003. “Przyszłość fenomenologii. Rozmowa z Ferdinandem Fellmannem,” Fenomenologia, vol. 1(1), pp. 37–48.

[10] Rabinow P. 2006. “Steps Toward an Anthropological Laboratory,” ARC Concept Note, vol. 1, http://anthropos-lab.net/wp/publications/2007/08/conceptnoteno1.pdf, accessed 27.07.2016.

[11] Raulet G. 2006. La philosophie allemande depuis 1945, Armand Colin.

[12] Schütz A. 1964. “Don Quixote and the Problem of Reality,” [in:] A. Schütz, Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 136–158.