Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 1(24) (2023): New Sociology of Leadership

Towards a Hopeful University

DOI
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.24.13
Submitted
September 25, 2024
Published
2024-09-26

Abstract

Drawing on insights from sociology and psychology, this paper points at hope as one of the key personal and communal strengths that contemporary academia needs in order to make use of its potential and fulfil its unique mission. It also shows the connection between futures studies, sociological reflection on hope, and the sociological understanding of leadership. The difference between unwarranted optimism and hope is explained, and hope is presented as a deeply creative, active process involving thinking more than feeling. The author argues that modern universities pay too little attention to the positive aspects of life, and thus universities become paradoxically less capable of executing their mission: to be leaders of positive change in every dimension of life, to conduct free research and free debate in which every bit of truth is respected, and to form ethical, wise leaders. Sadly, some fields of knowledge, such as sociology, lack a sufficiently developed theoretical apparatus to confront the problem. This paper concludes with recommendations for Eastern European academia.

References

  1. Alacovska A. 2018. “Hope Labour Revisited: Post-Socialist Creative Workers and Their Methods of Hope,” [in:] The New Normal of Working Lives: Dynamics of Virtual Work, eds. S. Taylor, S. Luckman, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66038-7_3.
  2. Bar-Tal D. 2001. “Why Does Fear Override Hope in Societies Engulfed by Intractable Conflict, as It Does in the Israeli Society?,” Political Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 601–627.
  3. Bennett O. 2015. Cultures of Optimism, Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Berger P.L. 1970. Rumor of Angels: Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural, Anchor Books.
  5. Berger P.L. 2007. Pytania o wiarę, Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
  6. Biełous E., Trzebiński J. 2014. “Nadzieja podstawowa a wizje świata społecznego,” Psychologia Społeczna, vol. 9(4), pp. 409–421.
  7. Blöser C., Huber J., Moellendorf D. 2020. “Hope in Political Philosophy,” Philosophy Compass, vol. 15(5), https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12665.
  8. Blöser C., Stahl T. 2020. The Moral Psycholog y of Hope, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  9. Brown N.J.L., Lomas T., Eiroa-Orosa F.J., eds. 2018. The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Positive Psycholog y, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659794.
  10. Cairns D. 2016. “Metaphors for Hope in Archaic and Classical Greek Poetry,” [in:] Hope, Joy, and Affection in the Classical World, eds. R.R. Caston, R.A. Kaster, Oxford University Press, pp. 13–44.
  11. Caston R.R., Kaster R.A., eds. 2016. Hope, Joy, and Affection in the Classical World, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190278298.001.0001.
  12. Cook J., Cuervo H. 2019. “Agency, Futurity and Representation: Conceptualising Hope in Recent Sociological Work,” The Sociological Review, vol. 67(5), pp. 1102–1117, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119859177.
  13. Curry L.A., Snyder C.R., Cook D.L., Ruby B.C., Rehm M. 1997. “The Role of Hope in Student-Athlete Academic and Sport Achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 73, pp. 1257–1267.
  14. Desroche H. 1973. Sociology of Hope, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  15. Durkheim E. 1999. O podziale pracy społecznej, trans. K. Wakar, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  16. Frankl V. 2006. Man’s Search for Meaning, Beacon Press.
  17. Gili G., Mangone E. 2023. “Is Sociology of Hope Possible? An Attempt to Recompose a Theroretical Framework and Research Programme,” The American Sociologist, vol. 54, pp. 7–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09539-y.
  18. Gunderson R. 2013. “Recovering a Disillusioned Modernism: The Enlightened Pessimism of Classical Sociology,” [in:] Social Theories of History and Histories of Social Theory, ed. H.F. Dahms, Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 129–159.
  19. Hage G. 2003. Against Paranoid Nationalism: Searching for Hope in a Shrinking Society, Pluto Press.
  20. Halford S., Southerton D. 2023. “What Future for the Sociology of Futures? Visions, Concepts and Methods,” Sociolog y, vol. 57(2), pp. 263–278, https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231157586.
  21. Havel V. 1998 The Art of the Impossible: Politics and Morality in Practice, Fromm International.
  22. Helland M.R., Winston B.E. 2005. “Towards a Deeper Understanding of Hope and Leadership,” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, vol. 12(2), pp. 42–54.
  23. Heuvel S. van den, ed. 2020. Historical and Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Hope, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46489-9.
  24. Jarymowicz M., Bar-Tal D. 2006. “The Dominance of Fear over Hope in the Life of Individuals and Collectives,” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 36, pp. 367–392.
  25. Karlsen J.E. 2021. “Futures Literacy in the Loop,” European Journal Futures Research, vol. 9, 17, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00187-y.
  26. Killian L.M. 1971. “Optimism and Pessimism in Sociological Analysis,” The American Sociologist, vol. 6(4), pp. 281–286.
  27. King M.L. 1991. A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr., ed. J.M. Washington, Harper.
  28. Kołakowski L. 1984. “Tezy o nadziei i beznadziejności,” [in:] L. Kołakowski, Cz y diabeł może być zbawiony i 27 innych kazań, Aneks, pp. 285–299.
  29. Krafft A.M., ed. 2018. Hope for a Good Life: Results of the Hope-Barometer International Research Program, Springer.
  30. Krafft A.M., Guse T., Slezackova A. 2023. “Theoretical Foundations and a Transdisciplinary Concept of Hope,” [in:] Hope across cultures: Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, eds. A.M. Krafft, T. Guse, A. Slezackova, pp. 23–54, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24412-4_2.
  31. Lamb M. 2016. “Aquinas and the Virtues of Hope: Theological and Democratic,” Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 44(2), pp. 300–332, https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12143.
  32. Lasch C. 1990. “Optimism or Hope? The Ethic of Abundance and the Ethic of Limits,” Sacred Heart University Review, vol. 10(2), 1, http://digital-commons.sacredheart.edu/shureview/vol10/iss2/1, accessed 3.07.2024.
  33. Levitas R. 2013. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society, Palgrave.
  34. Lopez S.J., Snyder C.R., Pedrotti J.T. 2003. “Hope: Many Definitions, Many Measures,” [in:] Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures, eds. S.J. Lopez, C.R. Snyder, American Psychological Association, pp. 91–106, https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-006.
  35. Ludema J.D., Wilmot T.B., Srivastva S. 1997. “Organization Hope: Reaffirming the Constructive Task of Social and Organizational Inquiry,” Human Relations, vol. 50(8), pp. 1015–1053.
  36. Luthans F., Youssef C.M., Avolio B.J. 2007. Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge, Oxford University Press.
  37. MacIntyre A. 1990. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition, University of Notre Dame Press, https://doi.or-g/10.2307/j.ctvpj75tx.
  38. McGeer V. 2004 “The Art of Good Hope,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 592(1), pp. 100–127, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203261781.
  39. McPherson D. 2021. The Virtues of Limits, Oxford University Press.
  40. Miller R. 2018. Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century, Routledge.
  41. Mittleman A. 2009. Hope in a Democratic Age: Philosophy, Religion, and Political Theory, Oxford University Press.
  42. Napiórkowski M. 2022. Naprawić prz yszłość, Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  43. Neves C.M. 2003. “Optimism, Pessimism, and Hope in Durkheim,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 4(2), pp. 169–183.
  44. Nichols L.T. 2005. “Integralism and Positive Psychology: A Comparison of Sorokin and Seligman,” Catholic Social Science Review, vol. 10, pp. 21–40.
  45. Nichols L.T. 2012. “North Central Sociological Association Presidential Address: Renewing Sociology. Integral Science, Solidarity, and Loving Kindness,” Sociological Focus, vol. 45(4), pp. 261–273.
  46. Nietzsche F. 2005. The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings, trans. J. Norman, ed. A. Ridley, Cambridge University Press.
  47. Positive Psychology Center. N.d. https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/, accessed: 4.09.2023.
  48. Ricoeur P. 1991. Podług nadziei, trans. S. Cichowicz, P. Kamiński, A. Krasiński, M. Łukasiewicz, A. Szczepańska, A. Tatarkiewicz, PAX.
  49. Schmid Callina K., Snow N.E., Murray E. D. 2018. “The History of Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives on Hope: Toward Defining Hope for the Science of Positive Human Development,” [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Hope, eds. M.W. Gallagher, S.J. Lopez, Oxford University Press, pp. 9–26.
  50. Seidman S. 1983. “Modernity, Meaning, and Cultural Pessimism in Max Weber,” Sociological Analysis, vol. 44(4), pp. 267–278, https://doi.org/10.2307/3711610.
  51. Seidman S. 1991. “The End of Sociological Theory: The Postmodern Hope,” Sociological Theory, vol. 9(2), pp. 131–146, https://doi.org/10.2307/202074.
  52. Seligman M. 1998. Learned Optimism, Pocket Books.
  53. Seligman M. 2013. Flourish, Atria Paperback.
  54. Skarga B. 2017. O filozofię bać się nie musimy: szkice z różnych lat, Fundacja na Rzecz Myślenia im. Barbary Skargi.
  55. Snow C.P. 1961. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press.
  56. Snyder C.R. 2002. “Hope Theory: Rainbows in the Mind,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 13(4), pp. 249–275.
  57. Suckert L. 2022. “Back to the Future: Sociological Perspectives on Expectations, Aspirations and Imagined Futures,” European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes De Sociologie, vol. 63(3), pp. 393–428, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975622000339.
  58. Szacki J. 2004. Historia myśli socjologicznej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  59. Sztompka P. 2003. Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge University Press.
  60. Tallis R. 1997. Enemies of Hope: A Critique of Contemporary Pessimism, Macmillian Press.
  61. Thomas Aquinas. N.d. The Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/1225-1274,_Thomas_Aquinas,_Summa_Theologiae_%5B1%5D,_EN.pdf, accessed: 10.06.2023.
  62. Tischner J. 1994. Świat ludzkiej nadziei: wybór szkiców filozoficznych, 1966–1975, Znak.
  63. Tutton R. 2023. “The Sociology of Futurelessness,” Sociology, vol. 57(2), pp. 438–453, https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221122420.
  64. Webb D. 2013. “Pedagogies of Hope,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, vol. 32(4), pp. 397–414, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9336-1.
  65. Weber M. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. H.H. Gerth, C. Wright Mills, G. Roth, C. Wittich, Oxford University Press.
  66. Weber M. 1949. On the Methodolog y of Social Sciences, The Free Press.
  67. Weber M. 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, trans. G. Roth, C. Wittich, Bedminster Press.
  68. Weber M. 1985. “‘Obiektywność’ poznania w naukach społecznych,” trans. M. Skwieciński, [in:] Problemy socjologii wiedzy, ed. A. Chmielecki, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. 45–100.
  69. Youssef C.M., Luthans F. 2007. “Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace: The Impact of Hope, Optimsm, and Resilience,” Journal of Management, vol. 33(5), pp. 774–800, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0149206307305562.
  70. Zyl L.E. van, Gaffaney J., Vaart L. van der, Dik B.J., Donaldson S.I. 2023. “The Critiques and Criticisms of Positive Psychology: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 206–235, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.